East Side Union High School District (ESUHSD), alongside the six other districts that were selected for these LCFF case studies, were selected through purposeful sampling, which calls for a sample from which most can be learned (Patton et al., 2015). In this case, we engaged in a process through which we identified a diverse set of school districts we should consider for this study. This included reaching out to several professional organizations that included the Association of California School Administrators (ACSA), California Teachers Association (CTA), California Collaborative for Educational Excellence, The California Endowment, and the CORE districts, among others. We then engaged in an initial research process to ensure diversity in contexts and initiatives. Some of the variables considered were district size, geography, implementation of LCFF, feasibility, potential to contribute to the field, and diversity in both the scope and theme of the district initiative to be studied.
The research team analyzed a variety of district-produced documents including the LCAP, several board documents and resolutions, the district’s budget, student outcome data and a pre-visit survey completed by the district. The research team then conducted a two-day site visit to the district and various school sites within ESUHSD. We interviewed 72 stakeholders, including students, teachers, principals, district officials, union representatives, school board trustees and community members. Additionally, we attended and interviewed youth leaders at a district-held youth leadership event. The research team transcribed and analyzed all interviews, analyzed notes, and produced an in-depth case study, focused on youth leadership and LCFF.
Table 1: Sample of Interviewees by Role
Education Stakeholders
Totals (n=72)
Students
37
Central District Office Staff
12
Community Organization/District Partner Members
10
Parents
6
Principals/School Site Administrators
6
Board Members
1
Appendix B: District Profile
Table 2. District Schools by Type (EdData)
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
Elementary School
0
0
N/A
Middle School
0
0
N/A
High School
11
11
N/A
Alternative
1
1
N/A
Continuation
4
4
N/A
Charter
10
10
N/A
Total
26
26
N/A
Note. School type data for 2019-20 were not available at time of writing.
Table 3. District Student Enrollment by Race/Ethnicity during Study Years (California Department of Education, 2020)
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
African American
2.3%
2.1%
1.8%
627
558
478
American Indian or Alaska Native
0.3%
0.2%
0.2%
82
53
53
Asian
32.4%
32.7%
32.7%
8,833
8,688
8,678
Filipino
6.9%
6.8%
6.5%
1,881
1,807
1,725
Hispanic or Latinx
50.8%
50.5%
51.2%
13,850
13,417
13,587
Pacific Islander
0.5%
0.5%
0.6%
136
133
159
White
4.9%
4.9%
4.8%
1,336
1,302
1,274
Two or More Races
1.9%
2.1%
2.3%
518
558
610
Not Reported
0.1%
0.2%
0.1%
27
53
27
Total
27,263
26,568
26,537
Note. Values represent counts and percentages of all students from the respective academic year.
Table 4. District Student Enrollment by Free or Reduced-Price Lunch (FRPL)-Eligibility, English Learner Status, and Foster Student Status during Study Years (California Department of Education, 2020)
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
FRPL-Eligible
53.4%
49.7%
47.8%
14,560
13,212
12,686
English Learner
20.8%
20.7%
20.1%
5,658
5,288
5,339
Foster Student
0.7%
0.5%
N/A
180
125
N/A
Note. Values represent counts and percentages of all students from the respective academic year. Foster Youth data for 2019-20 were not available at time of writing.
Table 5. District Teachers by Race/Ethnicity during Study Years (EdData)
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
Black or African American
3.8%
3.5%
N/A
47
43
American Indian or Alaska Native
0.6%
0.6%
N/A
8
7
Asian
15.5%
15.1%
N/A
191
185
Filipino
5.9%
5.9%
N/A
73
72
Hispanic or Latinx
23.1%
24.3%
N/A
286
297
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander
0.5%
0.3%
N/A
6
4
White
47.9%
47.8%
N/A
592
585
Two or More Races
0.8%
1.0%
N/A
10
12
Not Reported
1.9%
1.5%
N/A
23
18
Total
1,236
1,223
N/A
Note. Values represent counts and percentages of all teachers from the respective academic year. Data were not available for 2019-20 at time of writing.
Table 6. District General Fund Revenues by Category (EdData)
2017-18
2018-19
2019-20
LCFF Sources
$224,061,119
$238,525,405
N/A
Federal Revenue
$10,848,246
$11,562,572
N/A
Other State Revenue
$26,077,181
$38,131,201
N/A
Other Local Revenue
$11,188,962
$10,399,550
N/A
Total Revenues
$272,175,508
$298,618,729
N/A
Appendix C: Californians For Justice Student Voice Continuum